RefinementsCourse Specific Issues For example, many students are used to lectures closely paralleling the
material in the text, and will feel ambushed when tested on material not
covered in the lectures. If one intends to hold students responsible for
material not directly covered in class, ensure that this intention is clearly
stated in writing in the course outline, indicating the specific list of
readings for which students are responsible and the dates by which they
should have mastered the material. Similarly, some instructors assign readings
and test on them prior to covering the material in class, the intent being
that students should engage with the material and attempt to master it prior
to "getting the answer" from the instructor. Unfortunately,
students unfamiliar with this approach often perceive the pretest as a
scheduling error and complain on course evaluations that the instructor kept
assessing material before it was taught. Such misconceptions are easily
resolved by including a clear statement in the course outline explaining and
providing the rationale for this alternate approach. Some disciplines and instructors continually "raise the bar" for
assignments as the course progresses -- what is acceptable as an 'A' paper at
the start of the term would be considered only a 'B' or 'C' after a year of
instruction. This approach needs to be made clear to students in the course
outline, however, or may lead to a rash of grade appeals as students who
"did exactly the same as last time" are shocked by their new lower
grades. Even where the approach is common within the discipline or
department, a clear statement is required in each course outline so that
students from other majors taking the course are not taken by surprise. |